Changes
to the Family Code in California
by
James P. Reape
There are a number
of changes which have been made to the Family Code in California.
In this article we will touch on a couple of areas and address
more next month.
Defaults
The procedure to be
followed in processing a default has changed. The law now requires
that a a Request to Enter Default is to be undertaken by the County
Clerk. In the past, a party or their attorney would certify they
sent the request by mail to the party whose default was sought.
Under the new law, to request a default, the party must now provide
the court clerk with a stamped envelope addressed to the defaulting
party or their attorney. Frequently, parties to dissolution may
choose to proceed by default when they have reached full agreement
and sign an agreed upon or stipulated judgment or marital settlement
agreement. The Code now provides that when the spouse who is in
default signs a stipulated judgment or marital settlement agreement,
the signature must be notarized.
Previously, a party
to a dissolution or a legal separation action that was proceeding
by default submitted an affidavit or offer of proof setting forth
the grounds upon which the judgment was requested. Typically, a
party would check a box indicting that irreconcilable differences
had arisen during the marriage and that the marriage was over. Now,
the law requires that if the parties have a minor child, the affidavit
shall include the estimated gross income of each party, if known,
or an explanation of the parties lack of knowledge of the defaulting
party's income. Also, if there is a community estate (assets or
debts) the affidavit must include the estimated value of the assets
and debts proposed to be distributed to each party.
Job
Training and Work Requirement
In any proceeding involving
child or family support, the court is now authorized to require
either parent to attend job training, job placement, vocational
rehabilitation and a work program for a period specified by the
court. The court may further require the parent to return with documentation
of participation in the programs to enable the court to make a finding
that good faith attempts at job training and placement have been
undertaken.
Enforcement
of Child, Family and Spousal Support
The penalty now imposed
on employers who fail to provide relevant employment and income
information to the District Attorney enforcing a support order has
been increased to $1,000. Effective July 1, 1997, the Family Code
will require that all District Attorney actions or proceedings relative
to support will be heard by a child support commissioner unless
one is unavailable due to exceptional circumstances. Now, parties
to a District Attorney's support action can request that the court
join issues of custody, visitation and protective orders to the
actions for support filed by the District Attorney. The child support
commissioner will be required to refer disputed custody and visitation
issues for mediation. If mediation is unsuccessful, the commissioner
will refer that part of the case to a judge or another commissioner
for hearing. The child support commissioner will only hear contested
custody visitation and protective order issues if the court has
adopted procedures to segregate the costs of these actions from
the support action.
Spousal
Support Factors
The California Family
Code requires the Court to take into consideration several specified
factors in ordering spousal support. The law has been amended to
add the balance of hardship between the parties and the goal that
the supported party be self-supporting within a reasonable period
of time. This period is generally defined as one-half of the length
of the marriage. The goal of the party to be self supporting is
not intended to limit the court's discretion to order support for
a greater or lesser period than one-half the length of the marriage
if appropriately based on the consideration of other factors. Additionally,
except in limited situations, the court is required to advise the
parties that the goal of the State is that each party make reasonable
good faith efforts to become self-supporting and that the court
may consider a party's failure to do so as one of the factors for
modifying or terminating support.
|